Adjusting load on tethered aircraft

ABSTRACT

A system for adjusting a load on a tethered aircraft is disclosed. The aircraft is tethered to a payload. The system determines a new position for the tethered aircraft in the event that due to environmental effects, e.g., the aircraft is flying upwind or downwind, the load experienced by the tethered aircraft is not optimal.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Aircraft have been used to lift payloads. In some cases, multipleaircraft may be used to lift a payload. Each lifting aircraft may betethered to the payload. An aircraft with a payload tethered to itexperiences a load (force) due to the payload tethered to the aircraft.A battery or other power source of the aircraft may be desired to beconserved. Due to wind, the position or trajectory of the aircraft maynot be optimal, causing the tethered aircraft to consume greater batterypower than desired.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the followingdetailed description and the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a load adjustmentsystem.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a loadadjustment system.

FIG. 3A is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of an aircraft.

FIG. 3B is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of an aircraft.

FIG. 3C is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a payload.

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system to maintain atarget phase difference using throttle adjustment.

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system to maintain atarget phase difference using trajectory adjustment.

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a load adjustmentsystem.

FIG. 7A is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process totransport a payload using multiple lift aircraft.

FIG. 7B is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process totransport a payload using multiple lift aircraft.

FIG. 7C is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process totransport a payload using multiple lift aircraft.

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process to lifta payload using multiple lift aircraft.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process tomaintain a target phase difference using throttle adjustment.

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process tomaintain a target phase difference using trajectory adjustment.

FIG. 11A is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a loadadjustment process.

FIG. 11B is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a loadadjustment process.

FIG. 12A is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system to lift apayload.

FIG. 12B is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 12A in a firstposition of a transition to a flight configuration in which the payloadtows the lift aircraft.

FIG. 12C is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 12A in a secondposition of a transition to a flight configuration in which the payloadtows the lift aircraft.

FIG. 12D is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 12A in a flightconfiguration in which the payload is towing the lift aircraft.

FIG. 13A is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system to lift apayload.

FIG. 13B is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 13A in a firstposition of a transition to a flight configuration in which the aircraftis towing the payload.

FIG. 13C is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 13A in a flightconfiguration in which the aircraft is towing the payload.

FIG. 14 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process totransition to a forward flight configuration.

FIG. 15 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for aflight configuration for a payload towing an aircraft.

FIG. 16 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for aflight configuration for an aircraft towing a payload.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as aprocess; an apparatus; a system; a composition of matter; a computerprogram product embodied on a computer readable storage medium; and/or aprocessor, such as a processor configured to execute instructions storedon and/or provided by a memory coupled to the processor. In thisspecification, these implementations, or any other form that theinvention may take, may be referred to as techniques. In general, theorder of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within thescope of the invention. Unless stated otherwise, a component such as aprocessor or a memory described as being configured to perform a taskmay be implemented as a general component that is temporarily configuredto perform the task at a given time or a specific component that ismanufactured to perform the task. As used herein, the term ‘processor’refers to one or more devices, circuits, and/or processing coresconfigured to process data, such as computer program instructions.

A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention isprovided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate theprinciples of the invention. The invention is described in connectionwith such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to anyembodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims andthe invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications andequivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the followingdescription in order to provide a thorough understanding of theinvention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and theinvention may be practiced according to the claims without some or allof these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technicalmaterial that is known in the technical fields related to the inventionhas not been described in detail so that the invention is notunnecessarily obscured.

A system to adjust a load on an aircraft is disclosed. The systemcomprises an interface to receive wind information associated with afirst aircraft. The system further comprises a processor configured todetermine based at least in part on the wind information whether a firstaircraft included in a plurality of aircraft tethered to a payload andflying initially in an original elliptical trajectory is flying upwindor downwind. In the event the first aircraft is determined to be flyingdownwind, the processor is configured to cause the first aircraft to flyfurther from a vertical axis of the payload than a correspondingdistance associated with the original elliptical trajectory. In theevent the first aircraft is determined to be flying upwind, theprocessor is configured to cause the first aircraft to fly nearer to avertical axis of the payload than a corresponding distance associatedwith the original elliptical trajectory. In some embodiments, theplurality of aircraft are in the process of lifting the payload.

In some embodiments, a primary or first aircraft and a reference orsecond aircraft are tethered to a payload. The first aircraft and secondaircraft may lift the payload by flying in a periodic trajectory abovethe payload. The aircraft may circle the payload while flying at anincline, lifting the payload. More than two aircraft may be used.Multiple aircraft lifting the payload may not experience the same lift.For example, a first aircraft flying upwind experiences greater liftthan a second aircraft flying downwind. In the optimal loaddistribution, an aircraft experiencing greater lift shoulders a greaterload than an aircraft experiencing less lift. The optimal loaddistribution may result in saved battery power of the aircraft. Anoptimal load distribution may be such that multiple aircraft lifting thepayload experience varying loads. In some embodiments, an aircraftchanges its trajectory based on whether it is flying upwind or downwind.An aircraft may decrease the radius of its elliptical trajectory in theevent the aircraft is flying upwind and increase the radius of itselliptical trajectory in the event the first aircraft is flyingdownwind. In some embodiments, a second aircraft or multiple otheraircraft determine a complementary new trajectory and fly to thecomplementary new trajectory. The multiple aircraft may share the samenew periodic trajectory. The new trajectory may be a translation of theoriginal periodic trajectory in three-dimensional space or a tiltedversion of the original periodic trajectory.

In some embodiments, the system for load adjustment while the aircraftare lifting the payload is coupled with a system for maintaining a phasedifference. In some embodiments, the aircraft and payload transition toa forward flight configuration after lifting the payload a targetdistance from the ground. The aircraft may adjust their trajectory basedon one or more of the following: phase maintenance, load adjustment,power efficiency, or any other appropriate factor.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system to maintain atarget phase difference. In the example shown, aircraft_1 102 andaircraft_2 104 fly in a shared periodic trajectory 106 above payload100. Aircraft_1 102 is connected to payload 100 via tether 108.Aircraft_2 104 is connected to payload 100 via tether 110. In someembodiments, tether 108 and tether 110 are powered. In some embodiments,payload 100 is powered. Payload 100 may deliver power to aircraft_1 102and aircraft_2 104 via tether 108 and tether 110, wherein tether 108 andtether 110 conduct electricity. Payload 100 may use power to activelyengage in forward flight after it is lifted. In various embodiments,periodic trajectory 106 comprises a circular trajectory or an ellipticaltrajectory. In some embodiments, tethers are attached to the payloaditself and the payload spins as it is lifted. In some embodiments, thetethers are attached to a device surrounding the payload such as a ring,such that the device spins around the payload.

In some embodiments, aircraft_1 102 and aircraft_2 104 are launched intothe air using a catapult. In some embodiments, lift rotors or otherstructures may be used to launch the aircraft. In some embodiments,aircraft_1 102 is launched first and begins flying in trajectory 106,and aircraft_2 104 is subsequently launched and flies in trajectory 106at a set phase difference from aircraft_1 102. In various embodiments,techniques disclosed herein are used to ensure the aircraft_2 104 fliesin trajectory 106 at a set phase difference from aircraft_1 102. In someembodiments, aircraft_1 102 and aircraft_2 104 are initially launched toan altitude lower than the altitude of trajectory 106. In someembodiments, the aircraft fly in a periodic trajectory while increasingaltitude until they fly in periodic trajectory 106. In some embodiments,tethers 108 and 110 spiral, suspended in the air, as aircraft_1 102 andaircraft_2 reach a desired altitude. Aircraft_1 102 and aircraft_2 104may be optimized for forward flight and cruising. The aircraft may beinefficient at pure vertical flight. In some embodiments, aircraft_1 102and aircraft_2 104 are launched in order to save battery power. Batterypower may be conserved because the aircraft are launched by an externalforce instead of taking off using battery power. In some embodiments,aircraft_1 102 and aircraft_2 104 have hover capability and hover to thedesired altitude before flying in periodic trajectory 106. Aircraft_1102 and aircraft_2 104 may launch horizontally. In some embodiments,aircraft_1 102 is tethered to aircraft_2 104, and the aircraft pick uppayload 100 via a hook after the aircraft are airborne.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system tomaintain a target phase difference. In some embodiments, aircraft_1 202is implemented by aircraft_1 102 of FIG. 1. In some embodiments,aircraft_2 204 is implemented by aircraft_2 104 of FIG. 1. In theexample shown, aircraft_1 202 comprises interface 206, processor 208,and memory 210. In the example shown, aircraft_2 204 comprises interface212, processor 214, and memory 216. In the example shown, aircraft_1 202and aircraft_2 204 communicate via network 200. In some embodiments,additional aircraft or the payload are in communication with aircraft_1202 and aircraft_2 204 via network 200. In various embodiments, network200 comprises one or more of the following: Wi-Fi, Ethernet radio, veryhigh frequency (VHF) radio, a wireless network, the Internet, or anyother appropriate communication network. In various embodiments, network200 comprises one or multiple of any number of lower level networks,including 2.4 gHz or 900 mHz ethernet radios, zygbee radios, and anyother radio able to provide communications. The communication may beperformed using a range of protocols including Transmission ControlProtocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) and/or User Datagram Protocol (UDP).In some embodiments, UDP or other non-retransmitting protocols are used.

In some embodiments, aircraft_1 202 and aircraft_2 204 communicate theirpositions to each other in order to determine the phase differencebetween them. For example, the aircraft communicate whether they areahead or behind of a target position. In some embodiments, the targetposition for aircraft_1 202 comprises a position directly oppositeaircraft_2 204 on the periodic trajectory they are flying in. In someembodiments, multiple aircraft are spaced out equally on the periodictrajectory. The aircraft may be spaced out equally in timing on theperiodic trajectory. For example, aircraft may be facing different windbased on their orientation. In some embodiments, aircraft_1 202 andaircraft_2 204 adjust their trajectories simultaneously in response to adetected variance in phase difference from the target phase difference.For example, in lieu of one aircraft making an adjustment while theother aircraft continues its original trajectory, both aircraft makesmaller complementary adjustments. In some embodiments, the aircraft arein communication. In some embodiments, communication is not required.

In some embodiments, aircraft_1 202 is the primary lift aircraft andaircraft_2 204 is the reference lift aircraft. The primary lift aircraftmaintains a target phase difference from the reference lift aircraft byadjusting its trajectory, while the reference lift aircraft does notadjust its trajectory. The reference aircraft does not require telemetryinformation regarding the primary aircraft. In some embodiments, thereference aircraft institutes the same target phase adjustment system asthe primary lift aircraft and adjusts its trajectory complementarily.

In some embodiments, aircraft_1 202 and aircraft_2 204 communicate windinformation to each other. For example, aircraft_1 202 communicateswhether it is flying against wind, a direction of the wind, or a speedof the wind. In some embodiments, aircraft_1 202 and aircraft_2 204communicate a lift information to each other, such as a calculated liftcoefficient, climb rate, or tether load.

Aircraft_1 202 may communicate its lift information to aircraft_2 204based on the wind aircraft_1 202 is experiencing. An aircraft that fliesupwind or against the direction of the wind sees a higher dynamicpressure and thus will generate a higher lift than the one which isflying downwind. A load adjustment system may change aircrafttrajectories based on wind to optimize the lift capacity of the multipleaircraft. While it is advantageous to make use of the extra liftgenerated on the upwind vehicle, it is problematic to balance forcesbetween the upwind and downwind aircraft given the decreased dynamicpressure on the downwind vehicle. To solve this or as an outcome of thephase control applied herein, the upwind vehicle may in essence fly atighter circle at a lower flight speed and at a higher altitude, withgreater tether force, while the downwind flight vehicle flies a widercircle at a higher flight speed and a lower altitude.

Taking advantage of the lift generated by wind by increasing the load onthe upwind aircraft may save battery power of the aircraft. In someembodiments, flying multiple aircraft at the same altitude isinefficient and drains battery power. A load may be increased on anupwind aircraft by flying the aircraft closer to the vertical axis ofthe payload. Flying the first aircraft closer to the vertical axis ofthe payload and at a higher altitude than the other aircraft mayincrease the proportion of load from the payload that the first aircraftexperiences in comparison to the other aircraft. In the case that thetether is taut, flying closer to the vertical axis of the payload maybring the aircraft to a position of increased altitude. In someembodiments, the aircraft both adjust positions or trajectories in orderto experience an optimal load. For example, one aircraft may fly towardsthe vertical axis of the payload while the other flies away from thevertical axis of the payload, or one aircraft may fly at an increasedaltitude while the other flies at a decreased altitude. The aircraft mayoriginally fly in a periodic trajectory and adjusting their trajectoriesresults in flying in a tilted translation of the original periodictrajectory. The side of the trajectory wherein the aircraft fly upwindmay be at a higher altitude than the side of the trajectory wherein theaircraft fly with the wind. In some embodiments, the aircraft adjustpositions or trajectories based on information indicating whether theaircraft are flying upwind or downwind.

In response to wind, in some embodiments the primary aircraft mayreadjust a load it experiences by adjusting the aircraft's position ortrajectory, while the reference aircraft does not adjust its position ortrajectory. In some embodiments, the primary aircraft moves to a newaltitude. In some embodiments, a new position of the primary aircraft isthe same distance from the payload as the original position. Forexample, the tether is kept taut. In other embodiments, all aircraft areflying with the same control laws and as such are simultaneouslyadjusting to one another.

In various embodiments, no communication or indirect communicationexists between the aircraft. For example, an aircraft may utilize anapparent wind speed, a ground wind speed, a tether tension, or a tetherangle to determine whether the aircraft should move closer to thevertical axis of the payload or further from it. For example, anaircraft that is flying against the wind will experience an increasedtether tension due to increased lift in comparison to an aircraft thatis flying with the wind. The aircraft may determine the wind directionbased on its experienced tether tension. In some embodiments, the systemuses predictive control in order to preemptively adjust the aircrafttrajectories.

In some embodiments, aircraft_1 202 and aircraft_2 204 are incommunication with an external processor. Aircraft_1 202 and aircraft_2204 send telemetry information to the external processor, whichdetermines trajectory information and sends the information to one ormore of the aircraft. In some embodiments, the aircraft may relay windor lift information to the external processor, which processes theinformation. The external processor returns trajectory or positioninformation. In other embodiments, aircraft_1 202 and aircraft_2 204 arein direct communication with one another and exchange phase or otherstate information that then are utilized in their control laws. Invarious embodiments, the control laws for one vehicle are run on theother, one aircraft runs the control laws for both aircraft, or thecontrol laws are executed completely by a third computer placed in thesystem.

In some embodiments, aircraft_1 202 and aircraft_2 204 are incommunication in order to coordinate a transition between flightconfigurations. For example, as the aircraft and the payload transitionfrom a lift configuration to a forward flight configuration, theaircraft and the payload communicate their state. State may becommunicated in order to prevent collisions and coordinate thetransition. In some embodiments, the aircraft and the payload transmitsensor information via the network. In some embodiments, in forwardflight the lift aircraft may tow the payload behind them. The payloadmay be a winged flight vehicle capable of forward flight. In someembodiments, the payload aircraft tows the lift aircraft once fullytransitioned to forward flight. The payload may use a cruise optimizedpropulsion system.

FIG. 3A is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of an aircraft.Aircraft_1 300 comprises global positioning system (GPS) 302. In someembodiments, the phase difference between the primary aircraft and thereference aircraft is determined based at least in part on one or moreof the following: a sensor data, a visual data, or a location data. Invarious embodiments, multiple aircraft or the payload comprises globalpositioning systems, sensors, or cameras. In various embodiments, thephase difference is determined through estimation from data collectedfrom a range of sensors on one or both flight vehicles, possiblyincluding GPS, inertial measurement unit (IMUs), cameras, radar, sonar,or other inertial or position sensing device. In some embodiments,global positioning system 302 provides location information onaircraft_1 300. In some embodiments, aircraft_1 300 relays its locationto another aircraft tethered to the same payload. In some embodiments,multiple aircraft share their GPS location via a network in order todetermine the phase difference between two aircraft. In someembodiments, the GPS location is shared to determine a relative loadexperienced by the aircraft. In some embodiments, the GPS location isshared to prevent collisions.

FIG. 3B is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of an aircraft.Aircraft_2 330 comprises sensor 332. In various embodiments, sensor 332comprises a ground reference sensor, a line angle sensor, a relativeposition sensor, or any appropriate sensor. In some embodiments, sensor332 is used to determine a position of aircraft_2 relative to a payloador another aircraft. In some embodiments, the position information isused to calculate a phase difference between aircraft_2 and an aircraftrecognized by the sensor or to calculate a relative load experienced byan aircraft. In some embodiments, the sensors are used to preventcollisions. In some embodiments, an image or position detected by thesensor triggers a step in the series of steps used to transition from alift configuration to a forward flight configuration. For example, thedetection of the first aircraft flying at a target distance ahead of thepayload triggers the payload to engage forward flight at full speed. Insome embodiments, the aircraft and the payload transition in the absenceof direct communication with each other. The aircraft and the payloadmay run simultaneous controls and use sensors to coordinate their flightpaths.

FIG. 3C is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a payload.Payload 360 comprises camera 362. In some embodiments, camera 362 isused to capture images of aircraft tethered to payload 360. In variousembodiments, data captured by camera 362 may be used to determine aphase difference between two aircraft tethered to the payload, determinea lift information for an aircraft, or execute a flight configurationtransition. In various embodiments, payload 360 comprises a line anglesensor, a radar, or any other relative position sensor.

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system to maintain atarget phase difference using throttle adjustment. In the example shown,aircraft_1 and aircraft_2 are flying in trajectory 400. The target phasedifference for the aircraft in this example results in the aircraftflying directly opposite each other in circular trajectory 400, or nearopposite in side winds. If more than two lift aircraft are used, atarget phase difference that results in the aircraft being spacedsubstantially equally around the trajectory may be maintained, withslight target phase differences potentially entering at various pointsaround the loop with higher side winds. In the event the multipleaircraft are flying at the same altitude, the phase difference may bemaintained such that a load from the payload is equally distributedamongst the multiple aircraft. In some embodiments, the phase differenceis maintained such that the payload is lifted in a stable position withminimal swinging. As shown in FIG. 4, the phase difference betweenaircraft_1 position_1 402 and aircraft_2 position_1 408 does not matchthe target phase difference. A target position for aircraft_1 accordingto the target phase difference is at the dotted line, directly oppositeaircraft_2 position_1 408. As a result, aircraft_1 is determined to bebehind its desired position relative to aircraft_2. Throttle is adjustedsuch that the aircraft reach the target phase difference. Increasingthrottle causes the aircraft to fly faster and decreasing throttlecauses the aircraft to fly slower. In the scenario shown in FIG. 4, athrottle of aircraft_1 may be increased relative to a throttle ofaircraft_2 by an amount calculated to decrease the variance in phasedifference from the target phase difference by enabling aircraft_1 tocatch up to aircraft_2 along the trajectory and achieve a targetposition opposite aircraft_2. In various embodiments, the throttle ofaircraft_1 may be changed, the throttle of aircraft_2 may be changed, orthe throttle of both aircraft may be changed to maintain a spacing/phasebetween the two (or more) aircraft as they fly along the commontrajectory. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the target phase differencehas been attained by the time aircraft_1 is in aircraft_1 position_2 404and aircraft_2 is in aircraft_2 position_2 406.

Throttle adjustment may consume a significant amount of power, notablyin large, fast, or highly aerodynamic lifting aircraft or in comparisonto steady state circling flight. In some embodiments, the aircraft arepowered by a finite amount of battery power. In some embodiments,throttle adjustment is used as a supplemental or back-up phaseadjustment technique. In some embodiments, using throttle adjustment asa sole phase adjustment technique requires twice the power as using aphase adjustment technique that does not involve adjusting throttle.

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system to maintain atarget phase difference using trajectory adjustment. In variousembodiments, a target phase difference may be attained and/or maintainedat least in part by computing and adjusting the flight of the respectivelift aircraft to attain a target position along a new trajectory. In theexample shown in FIG. 5, positions 502 and 504 are initial positions ofthe first and second aircraft, respectively, on circular trajectory 500.Positions 502 and 504 do not correspond to the target phase difference,as indicated by the dashed horizontal line through position 504. Invarious embodiments, course and/or throttle adjustments for one or bothof the aircraft are computed and implemented to attain new positions 506and 508 of the first and second aircraft, respectively, on a newtrajectory 510. In some embodiments, an aircraft is determined to beahead or behind of a target position based on the variance in phasedifference. For example, in the example shown in FIG. 5, the aircraft inposition 502 may be determined to behind its target position. In someembodiments, in the event that an aircraft is determined to be behind atarget position based on the variance in phase difference, the newtrajectory determined for the aircraft is one that results in theaircraft moving towards a center of the original periodic trajectory,effectively cutting a corner to catch up. In the example shown, theaircraft in position 502 moves in a new trajectory to position 506. Inthe example shown, position 506 is closer to the center of trajectory500 than position 502. In some embodiments, the new trajectory cuts intothe original trajectory. The second aircraft, in this example, flies arelatively longer distance from position 504 to position 508. Theaircraft are maneuvered to the new positions 506 and 508, respectively,in a way calculated so that they arrive in the new positions at the sametime, resulting in their being in the target phase (180 degrees in thisexample) on the new trajectory 510. In the example shown, a newtrajectory is determined for both aircraft; both the aircraft deviatefrom their original trajectory. The new trajectory may be shared. Insome embodiments, an aircraft's trajectory is determined by a processorin the aircraft. In some embodiments, all aircraft trajectories aredetermined in an external processor that relays trajectory informationto the aircraft.

In some embodiments, in the event that an aircraft is determined to beahead of a target position based on the variance in phase difference,the new trajectory indicates that the aircraft moves away from a centerof the first periodic trajectory. For example, the second aircraft inposition 504 is ahead of its target position relative to the firstaircraft in position 502. In the example shown, the new trajectory forthe second aircraft results in the second aircraft being in position 508when the first aircraft reaches position 506. In the example shown, thephase difference between positions 506 and 508 is the target phasedifference. In the example shown, position 508 is further from thecenter of original trajectory 500 than position 504. In someembodiments, the new trajectory for the aircraft that is ahead cuts outof the original trajectory.

In some embodiments, the target steady state tether angle is calculatedor set so as to maximize the efficiency of the system in a referenceside wind or in a measured side wind, in a manner based on vehicleweight, flight speed, tether diameter and strength, and numerous othersystem parameters. The target tether angle from vertical used as thereference average angle may change from wind speed to wind speed so asto maximize gust rejection, minimize hovering energy, or maximizestructural margin, depending on the particular mission.

In some embodiments, the first aircraft and the second aircraft are incommunication while transitioning from their first positions to theirsecond positions. For example, they are communicating GPS data, sensordata, camera data, or location data. In some embodiments, thecommunication allows the aircraft to adjust their trajectories in theevent of unexpected redirections. In various embodiments, unexpectedredirections are caused by wind, obstacles, turbulence, environmentalfactors, a delay in an aircraft processor execution, or any otherfactor.

In some embodiments, the new trajectory is a translation of the firstperiodic trajectory. In the example shown, new trajectory 510 comprisingpositions 506 and 508 is a translation of original trajectory 500. Insome embodiments, the new trajectory remains near or within a setdistance of the first trajectory the aircraft were flown in.

In some embodiments, some of the multiple aircraft tethered to thepayload remain flying in the original trajectory. In some embodiments,in the event that the primary aircraft is behind a target position basedon the phase difference, the primary aircraft determines a newtrajectory that cuts into the original trajectory and rejoins the pathof the original trajectory. For example, the new trajectory of theprimary aircraft travels a shorter distance than the reference aircraft,which continues on the original trajectory. The primary aircraft thenrejoins the path of the original trajectory at a specific time such thatthe phase difference between the primary aircraft and the referenceaircraft is the target phase difference. In some embodiments, the newtrajectory of the primary aircraft provides a shortcut to a position onthe original trajectory.

In some embodiments, in the event that the primary aircraft is ahead ofa target position based on the phase difference, the primary aircraftdetermines a new trajectory that cuts out of the original trajectory andrejoins the path of the original trajectory. In some embodiments, thenew trajectory of the primary aircraft causes the primary aircraft totake a longer time to reach a position in the original trajectory thanit would if it flew in the original trajectory. In some embodiments, thenew trajectory of the primary aircraft allows the reference aircraft torelatively catch up, reinstating the target phase difference.

In some embodiments, the system for maintaining a target phasedifference compensates for wind effects. For example, wind may cause anaircraft to fly at a ground speed different than the airspeed. In someembodiments, the system for maintaining a target phase difference causesa battery of an aircraft to be preserved. For example, rather thanincreasing throttle variations and thus using increased root meansquared (rms) battery power to adjust phase, the phase is adjusted bymodifying a trajectory of an aircraft. In some embodiments, throttleadjustments are used as a secondary or supplementary method. In someembodiments, battery power of the aircraft is limited due to space orweight constraints. In some embodiments, a smaller or lighter aircraftis optimal for taking flight or gaining altitude easily.

In various embodiments, new trajectories may be computed by taking intoconsideration an objective relating to position relative to a fixedposition on the ground and/or another reference. For example,adjustments may be made such that new trajectories tend to keep theaircraft and/or trajectory located within a given envelope, within aprescribed distance from a point on the ground, etc. In someembodiments, adjustment to correct for deviations from the target phasedifference may be computed such that maneuvers to initiate theadjustment are initiated when the respective aircraft are in positionsalong the original trajectory such that the adjustments result in atranslation of the trajectory in a desired direction, such as to move ina direction of a geostationary or other reference point.

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a load adjustmentsystem. In the example shown, a first aircraft in position 610 and asecond aircraft in position 620 are flying in periodic trajectory 614.In the example, the first aircraft in position 610 and the secondaircraft in position 620 are connected to payload 600 via tether 602 andtether 608, respectively. In some embodiments, the first aircraft inposition 610 and the second aircraft in position 620 may be in theprocess of lifting payload 600 via tether 602 and tether 608.

In some embodiments, the first aircraft is configured to increase ordecrease a radius of its elliptical trajectory based at least in part onwhether the first aircraft is flying upwind or downwind. Increasing theradius may comprise one or more of the following: flying away from avertical axis of the payload, increasing a tether angle of the aircraft,or decreasing an altitude of the aircraft. Decreasing the radius maycomprise one or more of the following: flying towards a vertical axis ofthe payload, decreasing a tether angle of the aircraft, or increasing analtitude of the aircraft. In some embodiments, the first aircraftdecreases the radius of its elliptical trajectory in the event the firstaircraft is flying upwind. The first aircraft may increase the radius ofits elliptical trajectory in the event the first aircraft is flyingdownwind. The first aircraft may be determined to be flying upwind ordownwind based on one or more of the following: a speed, a direction, anair density, an air viscosity, an air compressibility, a speed of sound,lift information, or a tether tension. Decreasing the radius mayincrease the load experienced by the first aircraft due to the payloadand increasing the radius may decrease the load experienced by the firstaircraft due to the payload.

The radius may be a corresponding distance from the vertical axis of thepayload associated with the original elliptical trajectory. In someembodiments, flying the first aircraft nearer to the vertical axis ofthe payload than a corresponding distance associated with the originalelliptical trajectory increases the load experienced by the firstaircraft due to the payload and decreases the load experienced by asecond aircraft of the plurality of aircraft due to the payload. In someembodiments, flying the first aircraft further from the vertical axis ofthe payload than a corresponding distance associated with the originalelliptical trajectory decreases the load experienced by the firstaircraft due to the payload and increases the load experienced by asecond aircraft of the plurality of aircraft due to the payload.

In some embodiments, a second aircraft of the plurality of aircraft isconfigured to fly nearer to the vertical axis of the payload than acorresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory in the event the first aircraft flies further from thevertical axis of the payload than a corresponding distance associatedwith the original elliptical trajectory and is configured to fly furtherfrom the vertical axis of the payload than a corresponding distanceassociated with the original elliptical trajectory in the event thefirst aircraft flies nearer to the vertical axis of the payload than acorresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory. In some embodiments, a second aircraft of the plurality ofaircraft is configured to fly nearer to the vertical axis of the payloadthan a corresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory in the event the second aircraft is flying upwind and isconfigured to fly further from the vertical axis of the payload than acorresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory in the event the second aircraft is flying downwind.

In some embodiments, a lift information for the first aircraft isdetermined. The lift information may be determined by a processor withinthe aircraft. In some embodiments, the aircraft communicates with anexternal processor that is configured to compute lift information forthe aircraft. In some embodiments, the aircraft comprises sensors andrelays sensor information to its own processor or an external processor.The processor may determine lift information based on the sensorinformation. In some embodiments, the sensor information comprises windinformation. In some embodiments, the wind information comprises one ormore of the following: a speed, a direction, an air density, an airviscosity, or a speed of sound. The lift information may be based atleast in part on the wind information. In some embodiments, an aircraftflying upwind or against the wind experiences increased lift compared toan aircraft flying downwind or in the direction of the wind. In someembodiments, a lift coefficient is determined for the aircraft. The liftinformation or lift coefficient for the first aircraft is compared to alift information for the second aircraft. In some embodiments, a newposition for the first aircraft or the second aircraft is determinedbased at least in part on the comparison of the lift information for thefirst aircraft to the lift information for the second aircraft. In someembodiments, the first or second aircraft further fly in the newtrajectory or to the new position.

In some embodiments, the new position for the aircraft changes thealtitude difference between the aircraft and another aircraft tetheredto the payload. For example, the multiple aircraft may originally fly atthe same altitude, and the new position causes an aircraft to fly at ahigher altitude than the other aircraft. The distance from the aircraftto the payload may remain the same (e.g. the length of the tether),resulting in the aircraft moving to a position of higher altitude and ofdecreased distance to a vertical axis of the payload. The load on theupwind aircraft may be increased by moving the aircraft closer to avertical axis of the payload than the other aircraft are. The relativedifference from the vertical axis of the payload may be achieved bymoving one aircraft or multiple aircraft.

In the example shown, the first aircraft in position 610 moves to newposition 612. The second aircraft in position 620 moves to new position618. In the example shown, the aircraft in position 612 and position 618are flying in new periodic trajectory 618. In some embodiments, newposition 612 and new position 618 are determined based on the windinformation for the first and second aircraft. In some embodiments, thenew position for the aircraft changes the load experienced by theaircraft due to the payload. In some embodiments, the new positioncomprises a change in altitude. In some embodiments, the new positionmaintains a distance from the tethered aircraft to the payload. In someembodiments, the tethers are taut in the original and new position. Insome embodiments, the new position increases the load on the firstaircraft in the event the wind information indicates the first aircraftis upwind. In some embodiments, the new position decreases the load onthe first aircraft in the event the wind information indicates the firstaircraft is downwind. An aircraft may be determined to be upwind due toa high tether tension on the aircraft's tether. The high tether tensionmay be caused by the wind generating lift for the aircraft.

In the example shown, the first aircraft in position 610 may have beenflying upwind, whereas the second aircraft in position 620 was flyingdownwind. As a result, the first aircraft in position 610 experiencedgreater lift than the second aircraft in position 620. In someembodiments, flying the aircraft in a new trajectory compensates forwind effects. Adjusting the loads on the aircraft as disclosed hereinmay fix the dynamic pressure imbalance by both loading the upwindaircraft more, decreasing its speed by increasing its altitude, anddecreasing its speed by reduced thrust and increased drag throughincreased lifting. For example, the two aircraft might have a flightspeed of 20 meters per second (m/s) in a 10 m/s wind, resulting if nocourse corrections were made in 30 m/s apparent wind on the upwindvehicle and 10 m/s apparent wind on the downwind vehicle, furtherresulting, if no changes in angle of attack or aerodynamic controlsettings were made, in roughly 9 times the lift on the upwind vehicle.By adjusting speed, angle of attack, altitude, and thrust, the speedsmay be made more commensurate, while the adjustment to phase may alsoallow the upwind vehicle to carry more of the lift such that the liftimbalance would not create a substantial sideways acceleration on thepayload. In the example shown, the first aircraft moved from position610 to a higher altitude at position 612 while the second aircraft movedfrom position 620 to a lower altitude at position 618. In the exampleshown, position 612 is closer to the payload's vertical axis thanposition 618. The distance from the aircraft to the payload may be thelength of the tethers and remain unchanged throughout the process. Thevertical component of the force exerted by an aircraft increases as theaircraft becomes closer to directly over the center of the payload.Increasing the vertical component of the force exerted by an aircraftincreases the load experienced by the aircraft. In some embodiments, thefirst aircraft experiences a greater load than the second aircraft.

In the example shown, vertical axis 622 of payload 600 extends from thecenter of the payload. Position 610 is further away from axis 622 thanposition 612. Position 612 is closer to vertical axis 622 than thecorresponding position on trajectory 614. By moving to position 612, thefirst aircraft is closer to vertical axis 622 than it would be had itfollowed trajectory 614.

In some embodiments, the first aircraft returns to its original sharedelliptical trajectory after increasing or decreasing the radius of itselliptical trajectory for a period of time. The first aircraft maydivert from the original elliptical trajectory in the event the firstaircraft is flying upwind or downwind and return to the originalelliptical trajectory in the event the first aircraft is no longerflying upwind or downwind. In some embodiments, the new trajectory ofthe aircrafts is determined via a gain schedule. A time duration or adistance the first aircraft flies nearer to or further from the verticalaxis of the payload may be determined based on the gain schedule. Thegain schedule may map a wind speed to a quantitative change in anaircraft trajectory. For example, a sensor input (e.g. wind direction,wind speed, or tether tension) is mapped to a change in distance fromthe vertical axis of the payload. The mapping may be linear,exponential, or any appropriate relationship. In some embodiments, thegain schedule is determined in order to maximize the lift capacity ofthe multiple aircraft setup. In some embodiments, the gain schedule isdetermined via simulations of the aircraft and payload system. Asimulation may be run by testing a variety of gain schedules with avariety of payload masses. The gain schedule used in the load adjustmentsystem may be the gain schedule that was able to lift a payload of thegreatest mass in simulation.

In the example shown, new trajectory 618 is a translation of originaltrajectory 614. In some embodiments, the trajectory of the aircraftvaries within a set distance from the first trajectory. In someembodiments, the system for adjusting a load aids in equalizing thespeeds of the aircraft. For example, as an aircraft climbs to a positionof greater altitude, the aircraft is flying at a slower speed then whenflying at a stable altitude (e.g. when throttle is not changed).Alternatively, as an aircraft dives to reach a new position of a loweraltitude, the aircraft gains speed. In some embodiments, the aircraftfly in a compact trajectory that requires airspeed equalization.

In some embodiments, the first or primary aircraft changes itstrajectory to a different altitude or distance from the vertical axis ofthe payload, while the second or reference aircraft maintains itsoriginal trajectory. In some embodiments, both aircraft adjust theirtrajectories. In some embodiments, the first and the second aircraft arein communication while adjusting their trajectories and monitoring theother aircraft's position.

In some embodiments, changing the position or trajectory of the firstaircraft or the second aircraft causes a battery of the first aircraftor a battery of the second aircraft to be preserved. The battery may bepreserved through a reduction in average energy utilization at a givenlift. In some embodiments, the position change adjusts the loadexperienced by the aircraft, allowing the aircraft to more efficientlylift the payload.

In some embodiments, the system for load adjustment is executedsimultaneously with the system for phase management or other elements ofthe aircraft flight control system. In some embodiments, a newtrajectory is determined based on both phase management and loadadjustment factors. In some embodiments, an upwind aircraft cuts in tothe original trajectory and also increases its altitude. In someembodiments, a downwind aircraft cuts out of the original trajectory anddecreases its altitude.

FIG. 7A is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process totransport a payload using multiple lift aircraft. In the example shown,flight controller 700 comprises target path determiner 702, attitudecontroller 704, and estimator 708. In the example shown, target pathdeterminer 702 receives altitude, phase, position, and angle inputs. Theinputs may be related to an aircraft that the flight controller iscontrolling. In some embodiments, target path determiner 702 determinesa trajectory for the aircraft based on the inputs. Based on the inputs,target path determiner 702 may determine the aircraft is ahead in phase,behind in phase, flying upwind, flying downwind, engaged in a forwardflight configuration, or any other position information. In someembodiments, target path determiner 702 translates the target path intoa throttle level or attitude change of the aircraft. In the exampleshown, attitude controller 704 receives an input from target pathdeterminer 702 (e.g. the target path) and provides correspondingattitude levels to physical aircraft or wings 706. Target pathdeterminer 702 provides a throttle level to physical aircraft or wings706. In some embodiments, physical aircraft or wings 706 translates thesignals received as appropriate and sends the signals to the servos inthe physical wings or other physical parts of the flight vehicle. Insome embodiments, trajectory change is enacted due to the physicalconfiguration changes made to the aircraft (e.g. flapping wings, etc.).In the example shown, physical aircraft or wings 706 provides sensorinputs to estimator 708. In some embodiments, estimator 708 is ameasuring device that determines the attitude, phase, position, or angleof the aircraft based on sensor inputs. Estimator 708 may feed theinformation back to target path determiner 702. In various embodiments,the block diagram shown represents a maintaining target phase differencesystem, load adjustment system, or forward flight configurations system.

FIG. 7B is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process totransport a payload using multiple lift aircraft. In some embodiments,the actions of the flow diagram are executed by the primary aircraft. In710, phase difference from the reference aircraft is measured. In someembodiments, the phase difference is determined using sensors orcameras. In 712 it is determined whether the phase difference is greaterthan the target phase difference. Experiencing a phase differencegreater than the target phase difference may indicate the primaryaircraft is behind its target position.

In the event that the phase difference is greater than the target phasedifference, in 714 the radius of flight from the payload is decreased,throttle is increased, and the aircraft pitches down. In someembodiments, one or more of the three actions are executed. Decreasingthe radius of flight from the payload may allow the primary aircraft totake a shorter path than the reference aircraft and decrease the amountthe primary aircraft is behind. In some embodiments, the primaryaircraft and the reference aircraft fly in a translation of theiroriginal shared trajectory. In some embodiments, the primary aircrafttemporarily deviates from its original trajectory while the referenceaircraft remains in the original trajectory. Increasing throttle mayallow the primary aircraft to move faster than the reference aircraftand effectively catch up. Increasing throttle may be a secondary orsupplementary phase control action. In some embodiments, the aircraftpitches its wings down. However, the aircraft may move to a higheraltitude overall. A primary aircraft that experiences a greater phasedifference from the target may be flying upwind. Flying upwind may causean aircraft to fly at a slower ground speed than in the absence of wind.In some embodiments, flying upwind causes the aircraft to experiencegreater lift and move to a higher altitude. Pitching down may mitigatethe effect of the wind and prevent the aircraft from increasing inaltitude more than is efficient. Pitching down may allow the aircraft tomove to a radius and altitude that allows for the most efficient liftcapacity of the multiple aircraft system. Following 714, the process isfinished.

In the event that the phase difference is not greater than the targetphase difference, in 710 it is determined whether the phase differenceis less than the target phase difference. In the event that the phasedifference is not less than the target phase difference, the process isfinished. In the event that the phase difference is less than the targetphase difference, in 718 the radius of flight from the payload isincreased, throttle is decreased, and the aircraft pitches up. In someembodiments, the radius of flight from the payload is decreased to forcethe aircraft to take a longer path than the path of the originaltrajectory before rejoining the original trajectory. The throttledecrease may cause the primary aircraft to travel more slowly than thereference aircraft. The actions may adjust for the primary aircraftflying ahead of phase. In some embodiments, the primary aircraft isahead of phase due to flying downwind. The primary aircraft mayexperience less lift than the reference aircraft flying upwind. Theprimary aircraft may fly at a lower altitude due to increasing itsradius of flight from the payload's axis and flying with a taut,fixed-length tether. In some embodiments, the primary aircraft pitchesits wings up in order to mitigate its downward flight. For example, theaircraft may fly at an increased speed due to flying towards a decreasedaltitude when increasing its radius. The aircraft may pitch its wings upto prevent the aircraft from diving too quickly. Pitching up may allowthe aircraft to slow itself down.

FIG. 7C is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process totransport a payload using multiple lift aircraft. In 750, the liftaircraft are launched. In some embodiments, two lift aircraft arelaunched. In some embodiments, more than two lift aircraft are launched.In 752, a lift flow is executed. In some embodiments, the lift flow isimplemented by the lift flow described in FIG. 8. In 754, it isdetermined whether an indication to transition to a forward flightconfiguration is received. In the event an indication to transition to aforward flight configuration is not received, control passes to 752. Inthe event an indication to transition to a forward flight configurationis received, a forward flight configuration flow is executed in 756. Insome embodiments, execution of a transition is gated on various statecriteria which are set to maximize margin, in the sense of any ofstructural, control, stability, or statistical margin, before a forwardflight configuration flow is executed in 756. In some embodiments, theforward flight configuration flow is implemented by the forward flightconfiguration flow described in FIG. 14. In some embodiments, a landingflow may be executed following the forward flight configuration flow. Toexecute a transition to forward flight, the target center location inhovering mode flight may be accelerated until a substantial sidewaysvelocity is built up, after which point the lift aircraft either fullytransitions lift onto the payload, or after which point they transitionto a substantially forward or figure eight flight pattern so as theytransition lift onto the payload's wings. After lift is fullytransferred, the aircraft may continue to tow the payload from asubstantially forward position or are towed by the payload from asubstantially rearward position.

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process to lifta payload using multiple lift aircraft. In some embodiments, a firstaircraft and a second aircraft may implement the process of FIG. 8 tolift the payload via tethers. In 802, a course-based phase adjustmentflow is executed. In some embodiments, the course-based phase adjustmentflow is implemented by the course-based phase adjustment flow describedin FIG. 10. In some embodiments, it is determined whether thecourse-based phase adjustment optimally decreases the phase variance. Insome embodiments, the phase variance is a variance from the target phasedifference between the first aircraft and the second aircraft. In someembodiments, the optimal method of decreasing the phase variance isbased on predetermined factors, such as a maximum distance thetrajectory can be translated or a threshold for a distance moved fromthe trajectory. In the event it is determined that the course-basedphase adjustment does not optimally decrease the phase variance, athrottle adjustment flow may be executed. In some embodiments, thethrottle adjustment flow is implemented by the throttle adjustment flowdescribed in FIG. 9. In the example shown, the throttle adjustment flowis executed in 804 in parallel with the course based phase adjustmentflow and altitude adjustment flow 800. In some embodiments, the altitudeadjustment flow is implemented by the load adjustment flow described inFIG. 11A. In 808, resultant instructions are executed. In someembodiments, the instructions comprise instructions for the firstaircraft or the second aircraft to fly in a new trajectory. In someembodiments, the instructions comprise instructions for the payload oraircraft to change power levels or speed.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process tomaintain a target phase difference using throttle adjustment. In 900, aphase difference between the first aircraft and the second aircraft isdetermined. In 902, it is determined whether there is a variance in thephase difference. In the event that it is determined there is novariance in phase, the process is finished. For example, no variance inphase indicates the phase difference between the first aircraft and thesecond aircraft is the target phase difference and no further action isrequired. In some embodiments, the phase difference is checked based ona time interval, a trigger, or an indication from a system user. In theevent it is determined there is a variance in phase, in 906 it isdetermined whether the variance in positive. For example, from theperspective of the first aircraft, a positive variance indicates thephase difference from the front of the first aircraft to the back of thesecond aircraft is greater than the target phase difference. In theevent the variance is positive, in 908 an increased throttle level isdetermined. In some embodiments, an increased throttle level is providedin order speed up the first aircraft and catch up to its position. Inthe event the variance is not positive, in 910 a decreased throttlelevel is determined. In some embodiments, the decreased throttle isdetermined because the aircraft is relatively ahead. In 912, the newthrottle level is provided. In some embodiments, the new throttle levelcomprises instructions to implement the new throttle level.

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process tomaintain a target phase difference using trajectory adjustment. In 1000,a phase difference between the first aircraft and the second aircraft isdetermined. In some embodiments, the phase difference is determinedusing a proportional-integral-derivative controller. In someembodiments, the phase difference is determined based on a detectedacceleration, velocity, position, GPS information, or sensorinformation. In 1002, it is determined whether there is a variance inthe phase difference. In the event that there is no variance in thephase difference, the process is finished. In the event that there is avariance in the phase difference, in 1006 it is determined whether thevariance is positive. In the event the variance is positive, in 1008 anew trajectory that “cuts in” is determined. In some embodiments, atrajectory that “cuts in” is a new trajectory that causes the aircraftto fly closer to the center of the original trajectory. In someembodiments, the new trajectory allows the aircraft to travel in a shortpath from one position in the original trajectory to another position inthe original trajectory (e.g. a path that is shorter than the path onthe original trajectory). In some embodiments, the aircraft “cuts in”while another aircraft tethered to the payload complementarily “cutsout,” effectively translating the trajectory. In some embodiments, theaircraft's new trajectory allows the aircraft to catch up and decreasethe variance in phase. In the event the variance is not positive, in1010 a new trajectory that “cuts out” is determined. In someembodiments, a trajectory that “cuts out” causes the aircraft to flyaway from the center of the original trajectory. In some embodiments atrajectory that “cuts out” causes the aircraft to take a longer path toa position on the original trajectory than if the aircraft had continuedin the original trajectory. In some embodiments, as the aircraft “cutsout,” another aircraft tethered to the payload “cuts in.” In 1012, thenew trajectory is provided.

FIG. 11A is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a loadadjustment process. In 1120, wind information for an aircraft isreceived. In 1122, the wind information is input to a gain schedule. Insome embodiments, a processor determines whether the aircraft is upwindor downwind based on the wind information before 1122. In someembodiments, the gain schedule takes into account the direction of thewind. In some embodiments, the gain schedule provides an aircrafttrajectory change based on the wind information. In 1124, an aircrafttrajectory change is received. The aircraft trajectory change maycomprise a new elliptical trajectory to fly the aircraft in, or anadjustment to the current trajectory that causes the aircraft to flynearer to or further from the vertical axis of the payload. In 1126, thetrajectory change is executed.

FIG. 11B is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a loadadjustment process. In 1100, wind information for the aircraft isreceived. In some embodiments, wind information is collected usingsensors or measurement apparatuses on the aircraft. In 1102, liftinformation for the aircraft is determined. In some embodiments, liftinformation comprises a lift coefficient. In some embodiments, lift iscompared using a lift coefficient. In some embodiments, in the eventthat the aircraft experience equal lift, the loads do not need to beadjusted on the respective aircraft because they experience equal loadsin the original positioning. The original positioning may comprise theaircraft flying at the same altitude. In 1108 it is determined whetherthe aircraft with respect to which the process of FIG. 11 is beingperformed experiences greater lift than the second aircraft. In theevent that that the aircraft experiences greater lift than the secondaircraft, in 1110 a new position with an increased load is determined.

In some embodiments, determining lift information for the aircraft isnot necessary. Instead, the aircraft determine new positions ortrajectories based on wind information alone (e.g. whether the aircraftare flying upwind or downwind).

In some embodiments, the new position is at a higher altitude relativeto the previous position. In some embodiments, the new position is partof a temporary new trajectory that has a smaller radius or tether anglewith respective to the vertical axis of the payload. The new positionmay be at a higher altitude relative to the second aircraft. In theevent that that the aircraft experiences less lift, in 1112 a newposition with a decreased load is determined. In some embodiments, thenew position is at a lower altitude or further from the vertical axis ofthe payload. In 1114, the new position is provided. In some embodiments,instructions for moving to the new position are provided. The newposition may be a part of a new trajectory the aircraft is flying in.The aircraft may be in the process of lifting the payload. The newposition may be a part of a new trajectory that is effectively a tiltedversion of a previous elliptical trajectory.

FIG. 12A is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system to lift apayload. FIG. 12A is a diagram illustrating the lift configuration ofthe flight configuration. In some embodiments, the lift configurationcomprises the lift aircraft and a second lift aircraft flying in aperiodic trajectory. In the example shown, aircraft_1 1202 andaircraft_2 1206 fly in continuous periodic trajectory 1204. In someembodiments, the lift configuration comprises the lift aircraft and asecond lift aircraft flying in a periodic trajectory with a fixed phasedifference between the lift aircraft and the second lift aircraft. Insome embodiments, aircraft_1 1202 lifts payload 1212 via tether 1208 andaircraft_2 1206 lifts payload 1212 via tether 1210. In some embodiments,a system for phase maintenance and a system for load adjustment areconcurrently executed on the aircraft and payload.

FIG. 12B is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 12A in a firstposition of a transition to a flight configuration in which the payloadtows the lift aircraft. In the example shown, aircraft_1 1202,aircraft_2 1206, and payload 1212 have begun to transition from the liftconfiguration as shown in FIG. 12A to a forward flight configuration.Aircraft_1 1202 and aircraft_2 1206 are shown as having executedcoordinated maneuvers to transition to forward flight, in a direction tothe right as shown. At the same time, payload 1212, which in thisexample is itself capable of at least forward flight, is shown to bemaneuvering down and under the lift aircraft 1202, 1206. In someembodiments, the forward flight configuration comprises a change in atarget phase difference between the lift aircraft and a second liftaircraft. In some embodiments, aircraft_1 1202 and aircraft B 1206 nolonger maintain a target phase difference between them. In someembodiments, aircraft_1 1202 and aircraft_2 1206 engage in forwardflight. In some embodiments, one aircraft slides forward from theoriginal continuous periodic trajectory while the other aircraft slidesback or flies forward at a relatively slower speed, resulting in themflying in the same direction. In some embodiments, the first aircraftflies in a straight path rather than in the periodic trajectory, and thesecond aircraft follows until the two aircraft are flying in parallel.In some embodiments, aircraft_1 1202 and aircraft_2 1206 fly at anupward incline. In some embodiments, payload 1212 flies under aircraft_11202 and aircraft_2 1206, as shown.

FIG. 12C is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 12A in a secondposition of a transition to a flight configuration in which the payloadtows the lift aircraft. In the example shown, payload 1212 flies underand past aircraft_1 1202 and aircraft_2 1206. In some embodiments, theseries of steps for the transition to forward flight comprise increasingor decreasing power to one or more of the powered payload and the liftaircraft. In some embodiments, payload 1212 flies at a greater speedthan the lift aircraft 1202, 1206. In some embodiments, tether 1208 andtether 1210 have slack as payload 1212 flies past the lift aircraft1202, 1206.

FIG. 12D is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 12A in a flightconfiguration in which the payload is towing the lift aircraft. In someembodiments, the payload is powered and comprises a motor. In theexample shown, the powered payload 1212 tows the lift aircraft 1202,1206 behind the powered payload 1212. The angle between the first liftaircraft and the second lift aircraft may be determined to minimizetether drag. In some embodiments, a ten degree angle between theaircraft results in a minimal drag of three percent. In someembodiments, the forward flight configuration comprises the first liftaircraft and a second lift aircraft flying in parallel. In someembodiments, the first or second lift aircraft comprises propellers thatare spun as the payload tows the aircraft. In some embodiments, thepropellers are used to recharge batteries as the aircraft is dragged. Insome embodiments, the payload is cruise optimized or comprises a wing.In some embodiments, the aircraft are optimized for lifting the payloadand are light. In some embodiments, the majority of the battery powerfor the system is supplied by the payload.

FIG. 13A is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system to lift apayload. FIG. 13A is a diagram illustrating the lift configuration. Inthe example shown, aircraft_1 1302 and aircraft_2 1306 fly in continuousperiodic trajectory 1304. In the example shown, aircraft_1 1302 liftspayload 1300 via tether 1308 and aircraft_2 1306 lifts payload 1300 viatether 1310.

FIG. 13B is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 13A in a firstposition of a transition to a flight configuration in which the aircraftis towing the payload. In some embodiments, aircraft_1 1302 andaircraft_2 1306 engage in forward flight. In some embodiments, theaircraft switch from a phase maintenance mode to a forward flight mode.In some embodiments, aircraft_1 1302 and aircraft_2 1306 fly at anincline toward the ground. In some embodiments, payload 1300 experienceslift while it is towed behind by tether 1308 and tether 1310. In someembodiments, the aircraft and payload are in communication to coordinatethe transition. In some embodiments, payload 1300, aircraft_1 1302, andaircraft_2 1306 adjust their trajectories in order to fly at similaraltitudes. In some embodiments, the powered payload and an aircraft eachreceive telemetry information about the other.

FIG. 13C is a diagram illustrating the system of FIG. 13A in a flightconfiguration in which the aircraft is towing the payload. In someembodiments, the flight configuration comprises the first lift aircraftand a second lift aircraft towing the powered payload behind the liftaircraft and the second lift aircraft, wherein the angle between thefirst lift aircraft and the second lift aircraft is determined tominimize tether drag. In some embodiments, aircraft_1 1302 andaircraft_2 1306 fly in front of payload 1300, connected via tether 1308and tether 1310. In some embodiments, the aircraft and payload fly atsimilar altitudes and in the same direction. In some embodiments, theaircraft are built to be light in order to optimally lift the payload.In some embodiments, main battery power is stored in payload 1300. Insome embodiments, the powered payload provides power to the liftaircraft. In some embodiments, a tether is powered. In some embodiments,the tether comprises a rope around a metallic (e.g. copper) cord,wherein a coefficient of the rope is matched to the coefficient of themetallic cord.

FIG. 14 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process totransition to a forward flight configuration. In 1400, an indication totransition to a flight configuration is received. In some embodiments, afirst aircraft, second aircraft, and payload are capable of executing apayload first or an aircraft first forward flight configuration. Inother embodiments, not shown in FIG. 14, a given system may beconfigured to implement only one or the other of a payload first forwardflight configuration, as in FIGS. 12A-12D and a lift aircraft firstforward flight configuration, as in FIGS. 13A-13C. Referring further toFIG. 14, in 1402 it is determined whether the flight configuration to betransitioned to comprises an aircraft towing a payload. In the eventthat the flight configuration comprises an aircraft towing a payload, in1408, a flight configuration instruction for an aircraft towing apayload is provided. In some embodiments, the flight configurationinstruction is implemented by the instruction flow described in FIG. 16.In the event that the flight configuration does not comprise an aircrafttowing a payload, in 1404 is it determined whether the flightconfiguration comprises a payload towing an aircraft. In the event thatthe flight configuration does comprise a payload towing an aircraft, in1406 a flight configuration instruction for a payload towing an aircraftis provided. In some embodiments, the flight configuration instructionis implemented by the instruction flow described in FIG. 15. In theevent that the flight configuration does not comprise a payload towingan aircraft, in 1405 an error message is provided. In some embodiments,the error message is provided based on whether the flight configurationis recognized or in the event that instructions do not exist for theflight configuration. In some embodiments, the flow is executed by aprocessor external to the payload and aircraft. In some embodiments, theexternal processor provides determines and provides instructions to thepayload and aircraft. In some embodiments, a payload or aircraftcomprises a processor that determines and provides flight instructions.

In some embodiments, a payload, a first aircraft, and a second aircraftis preconfigured to execute a designated forward flight configuration.In some embodiments, battery placement in the payload or aircraft isdetermined based on the designated forward flight configuration. In someembodiments, a tether is designed to be powered or not based on thedesignated forward flight configuration. In some embodiments, a payloadand multiple tethered aircraft are configured to execute a designatedforward flight configuration based on a signal, an altitude, a time, orany other appropriate reason.

FIG. 15 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for aflight configuration for a payload towing an aircraft. In 1500, theaircraft climb to a transition altitude and speed. In 1502, forwardflight is engaged in the aircraft. In some embodiments, lift aircraftphase control is disabled such that the aircraft depart from an originalperiodic trajectory. In 1504, payload forward flight is engaged. In1506, the payload is engaged to fly under the aircraft. In someembodiments, the payload flies past the aircraft. In 1508, the aircraftis engaged to fly in front of the aircraft. In some embodiments, theaircraft fly behind the payload with a shallow angle between theaircraft.

FIG. 16 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a process for aflight configuration for an aircraft towing a payload. In 1600, theaircraft climb to a transition altitude and speed. In 1602, forwardflight is engaged in the aircraft. In 1604, payload forward flight isengaged. In 1606, the payload is flown behind the aircraft. In 1608, theaircraft are engaged to fly at a shallow angle ahead of the liftaircraft. In some embodiments, the angle is determined to minimize drag.

In some embodiments, a landing flow may be executed following a forwardflight configuration. In some embodiments, the landing flow comprisesthe payload flying at a decreased speed or turning off power to thepayload. In some embodiments, a second aircraft follows a first aircraftinto flying in a continuous periodic trajectory. In some embodiments,the first aircraft and the second aircraft fly at a decline towards theground in the continuous periodic trajectory until the payload reachesthe ground.

Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detailfor purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limitedto the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementingthe invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and notrestrictive.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system to adjust a load including: an interfaceto receive wind information associated with a first aircraft included ina plurality of aircraft tethered to a payload, wherein the firstaircraft is flying initially in an original elliptical trajectory,wherein the plurality of aircraft are lifting the payload beforetransitioning to a forward flight configuration, and wherein the windinformation is generated by a sensor on the first aircraft; and aprocessor configured to: determine based at least in part on the windinformation whether the first aircraft is flying upwind or downwind; inthe event the first aircraft is determined to be flying downwind, causethe first aircraft to fly further from a vertical axis of the payloadthan a corresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory and increase a tether angle of the aircraft, wherein thetether angle is relative to the vertical axis; and in the event thefirst aircraft is determined to be flying upwind, cause the firstaircraft to fly nearer to the vertical axis of the payload than thecorresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory and decrease the tether angle of the aircraft, wherein: theplurality of aircraft further includes a second aircraft configured todetermine and fly to a complementary new trajectory in response to thefirst aircraft flying one or both of further from and nearer to thevertical axis of the payload than the corresponding distance associatedwith the original elliptical trajectory; the first aircraft and thesecond aircraft maintain a set phase difference between them; thecausing of the first aircraft to fly nearer to the vertical axis of thepayload than the corresponding distance associated with the originalelliptical trajectory and the decreasing of the tether angle of theaircraft comprises to: in response to a determination that a variance inthe set phase difference between the first aircraft and the secondaircraft has been detected, adjust a trajectory of at least one of thefirst aircraft and the second aircraft to maintain the set phasedifference; the first aircraft is tethered to the payload by a firsttether; the second aircraft is tethered to the payload by a secondtether; a length of the first tether and a length of the second tetherremain unchanged throughout the causing of the first aircraft to flynearer to the vertical axis operation; and in the event that theplurality of aircraft and the payload transition from a flightconfiguration of lifting the payload to the forward flightconfiguration, one aircraft of the first aircraft and the secondaircraft flies in a straight path and the other aircraft of the firstaircraft and the second aircraft follows the one aircraft until theplurality of aircraft are flying in parallel.
 2. The system of claim 1,wherein the plurality of aircraft are in the process of lifting thepayload.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first aircraft and thesecond aircraft fly opposite from each other in the original ellipticaltrajectory.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the second aircraft of theplurality of aircraft is configured to fly nearer to the vertical axisof the payload than a corresponding distance associated with theoriginal elliptical trajectory in the event the first aircraft fliesfurther from the vertical axis of the payload than a correspondingdistance associated with the original elliptical trajectory and isconfigured to fly further from the vertical axis of the payload than acorresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory in the event the first aircraft flies nearer to the verticalaxis of the payload than a corresponding distance associated with theoriginal elliptical trajectory.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein thesecond aircraft of the plurality of aircraft is configured to fly nearerto the vertical axis of the payload than a corresponding distanceassociated with the original elliptical trajectory in the event thesecond aircraft is flying upwind and is configured to fly further fromthe vertical axis of the payload than a corresponding distanceassociated with the original elliptical trajectory in the event thesecond aircraft is flying downwind.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein inthe event the first aircraft is flying upwind or downwind, the originalelliptical trajectory of the plurality of aircraft is translated.
 7. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the first aircraft diverts from the originalelliptical trajectory in the event the first aircraft is flying upwindor downwind and returns to the original elliptical trajectory in theevent the first aircraft is no longer flying upwind or downwind.
 8. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the first aircraft maintains a fixed distancefrom the payload.
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein flying further fromthe vertical axis of the payload than a corresponding distanceassociated with the original elliptical trajectory comprises decreasingan altitude of the first aircraft.
 10. The system of claim 1, whereinflying nearer to the vertical axis of the payload than a correspondingdistance associated with the original elliptical trajectory comprisesincreasing an altitude of the first aircraft.
 11. The system of claim 1,wherein the first aircraft is determined to be flying upwind or downwindbased on one or more of the following: a speed, a direction, an airdensity, an air viscosity, an air compressibility, a speed of sound,lift information, or a tether tension.
 12. The system of claim 1,wherein flying the first aircraft nearer to the vertical axis of thepayload than a corresponding distance associated with the originalelliptical trajectory increases the load experienced by the firstaircraft due to the payload and decreases the load experienced by asecond aircraft of the plurality of aircraft due to the payload.
 13. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein flying the first aircraft further from thevertical axis of the payload than a corresponding distance associatedwith the original elliptical trajectory decreases the load experiencedby the first aircraft due to the payload and increases the loadexperienced by a second aircraft of the plurality of aircraft due to thepayload.
 14. The system of claim 1, wherein a time duration or adistance the first aircraft flies nearer to or further from the verticalaxis of the payload is determined based on a gain schedule.
 15. Thesystem of claim 14, wherein the gain schedule maps a wind speed to aquantitative change to an aircraft trajectory.
 16. The system of claim14, wherein the gain schedule is determined to maximize a lift capacityof the first aircraft lifting the payload.
 17. The system of claim 1,wherein the plurality of aircraft are not in communication with oneanother.
 18. The system of claim 1, wherein flying the first aircraftnearer to or further from the vertical axis of the payload than acorresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory compensates for wind effects.
 19. A computer program productto adjust a load, the computer program product being embodied in anon-transitory computer readable storage medium and comprising computerinstructions for: receiving wind information associated with a firstaircraft included in a plurality of aircraft tethered to a payload,wherein the first aircraft is flying initially in an original ellipticaltrajectory, wherein the plurality of aircraft are lifting the payloadbefore transitioning to a forward flight configuration, and wherein thewind information is generated by a sensor on the first aircraft;determining based at least in part on the wind information whether thefirst aircraft is flying upwind or downwind; in the event the firstaircraft is determined to be flying downwind, causing the first aircraftto fly further from a vertical axis of the payload than a correspondingdistance associated with the original elliptical trajectory andincreasing a tether angle of the first aircraft, wherein the tetherangle is relative to the vertical axis; and in the event the firstaircraft is determined to be flying upwind, causing the first aircraftto fly nearer to the vertical axis of the payload than the correspondingdistance associated with the original elliptical trajectory anddecreasing the tether angle of the aircraft, wherein: the plurality ofaircraft further includes a second aircraft configured to determine andfly to a complementary new trajectory in response to the first aircraftflying one or both of further from and nearer to the vertical axis ofthe payload than the corresponding distance associated with the originalelliptical trajectory; the first aircraft and the second aircraftmaintain a set phase difference between them; the causing of the firstaircraft to fly nearer to the vertical axis of the payload than thecorresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory and the decreasing of the tether angle of the aircraftcomprises: in response to a determination that a variance in the setphase difference between the first aircraft and the second aircraft hasbeen detected, adjusting a trajectory of at least one of the firstaircraft and the second aircraft to maintain the set phase difference;the first aircraft is tethered to the payload by a first tether; thesecond aircraft is tethered to the payload by a second tether; a lengthof the first tether and a length of the second tether remain unchangedthroughout the causing operation; and in the event that the plurality ofaircraft and the payload transition from a flight configuration oflifting the payload to the forward flight configuration, one aircraft ofthe first aircraft and the second aircraft flies in a straight path andthe other aircraft of the first aircraft and the second aircraft followsthe one aircraft until the plurality of aircraft are flying in parallel.20. The system of claim 1, wherein in the event that the plurality ofaircraft and the payload transition from a flight configuration oflifting the payload to a forward flight configuration, the one aircraftand the other aircraft fly at an upward incline.
 21. A method foradjusting a load, comprising: receiving wind information associated witha first aircraft included in a plurality of aircraft tethered to apayload, wherein the first aircraft is flying initially in an originalelliptical trajectory, wherein the plurality of aircraft are lifting thepayload before transitioning to a forward flight configuration, andwherein the wind information is generated by a sensor on the firstaircraft; determining based at least in part on the wind informationwhether the first aircraft is flying upwind or downwind; in the eventthe first aircraft is determined to be flying downwind, causing thefirst aircraft to fly further from a vertical axis of the payload than acorresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory and increasing a tether angle of the first aircraft, whereinthe tether angle is relative to the vertical axis; and in the event thefirst aircraft is determined to be flying upwind, causing the firstaircraft to fly nearer to the vertical axis of the payload than thecorresponding distance associated with the original ellipticaltrajectory and decreasing the tether angle of the aircraft, wherein: theplurality of aircraft further includes a second aircraft configured todetermine and fly to a complementary new trajectory in response to thefirst aircraft flying one or both of further from and nearer to thevertical axis of the payload than the corresponding distance associatedwith the original elliptical trajectory; the first aircraft and thesecond aircraft maintain a set phase difference between them; thecausing of the first aircraft to fly nearer to the vertical axis of thepayload than the corresponding distance associated with the originalelliptical trajectory and the decreasing of the tether angle of theaircraft comprises: in response to a determination that a variance inthe set phase difference between the first aircraft and the secondaircraft has been detected, adjusting a trajectory of at least one ofthe first aircraft and the second aircraft to maintain the set phasedifference; the first aircraft is tethered to the payload by a firsttether; the second aircraft is tethered to the payload by a secondtether; a length of the first tether and a length of the second tetherremain unchanged throughout the causing operation; and in the event thatthe plurality of aircraft and the payload transition from a flightconfiguration of lifting the payload to the forward flightconfiguration, one aircraft of the first aircraft and the secondaircraft flies in a straight path and the other aircraft of the firstaircraft and the second aircraft follows the one aircraft until theplurality of aircraft are flying in parallel.